Stewardship Act – Clarity Needed

clarity

I’ll have some of that, please.

Update:  I did eventually get documents from the county.

For the most part, the Florida Keys Stewardship Act (FKSA) has been presented to the public as an “environmental” bill.  However, when Kevin Diaz pointed out that certain aspects of the bill might negatively affect the Keys environment, Comm. Carruthers responded with a pompous, tedious and extremely hostile rant claiming that it was not an environmental bill at all, but a “multi-faceted approach to addressing various needs arising from the State’s designation of the Florida Keys as an Area of Critical State Concern”.  Hmmm….apparently environmental concerns have been run over by rambling, officious bureaucrat-speak.

Here’s just some of the media coverage of the bill:

The public was most definitely led to believe that the FKSA was all about protecting the Keys environment.  I definitely went with the flow.  It all sounded good.  Media coverage and statements made by Raschein and county officials indicated that water quality projects and conservation land were the primary focus and that the existing Mayfield interlocal agreement would be preserved.  Neither appears to be the case.

Kevin Diaz’s letter woke me up.  He, along with the rest of us assumed that the FKSA was an environmental bill.  And why wouldn’t we?  That is what we’ve been told all along.  Diaz went to the trouble of actually reading the bill, unlike me (to my everlasting shame and regret).  He pointed out that several of the provisions in this “environmental” bill have possible anti-environmental implications, and wondered why they were included.

County commissioner, Heather Carruthers’s hostile response only adds to the suspicion and uncertainty.  Her pompous, tedious, condescending letter seemed designed to discourage any criticism, analysis or open discussion of the bill.  Why?  Why is Diaz wrong for reading the bill and questioning its implications?  Is this how Carruthers would respond to a constituent who had questions?  If she wanted to send the message that questions and concerns are unwelcome, she certainly succeeded.  Add that to county staff’s confusion regarding my very straightforward public records request and it looks like the county is playing games again.

By the way, I asked Carruthers a few questions on her Facebook page.  No response yet.  Perhaps another blistering tirade will pop up somewhere in answer to my “stupid” questions.  (Carruthers has since deleted and disabled comments.  No two-way communication allowed.)

Most amazing of all, Carruthers strongly de-emphasized the FKSA as an environmental bill, especially the water quality aspects.  Again, the bill has been presented all along as primarily about water quality and conservation land.  Water quality projects were the first items mentioned by Raschein in her interview.  But according to Carruthers water quality is definitely not a priority.

The bill is more than just a water quality bill. In fact, the term “water quality” appears in only 5 places among the 16 pages/414 lines of text. The bill is a multi-faceted approach to addressing various needs arising from the State’s designation of the Florida Keys as an Area of Critical State Concern. The Act touches upon topics such as funding sources for acquiring conservation land and satisfying property rights claims, and correcting an oversight that prohibited use of certain state monies within the City of Key West.

Once again, we are faced with a seemingly impenetrable wall of incoherent rhetoric.  Clarity is needed.

  • Will the FKSA preserve the division of funding agreed to by the entities of the Florida Keys?  Or was that another lie?
  • Is there a plan for land acquisitions as stated by Raschein?  Will conservation land be prioritized?  How will purchases be vetted?
  • How will hurricane evacuation times be reduced without widening roads?
  • Who will benefit from “affordable” housing?

Lots of questions.  Very few answers.

By the way, the KeyNoter expressed concerns about the FKSA in an editorial a while back and I poo-pooed them.  Turns out they were right.  Should have actually read it way before Diaz wrote his letter.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in BOCC, Florida Keys Stewardship Act, Media, Monroe County, Public Records. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s